Surveillance society

July 21, 2011

Gary Thomas and Nick Peim are right ("In ourselves we trust: if quality is the aim, think outside the tick-box", 14 July): the removal of trust means the removal of responsibility. I would go further: thought falls victim, too.

We are a small specialist performing arts institution with a turnover of roughly £8.5 million. In addition to external auditors, we are obliged to have internal auditors. Our governing body must have an audit committee as well.

What is the point of all this surveillance? Higher education is hardly the first port of call for fraudsters, is it? We have qualified accountants in our finance team. What is the point of gaining professional qualifications if you can't be trusted to adhere to professional standards?

Mark Featherstone-Witty, Founding principal/chief executive officer Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments