You report a BBC finding that Oxbridge admission processes prefer autumn-born candidates (The week in higher education, 7 March). The next day, The Guardian published an article headed “Summer-born children suffer educational inequality, study finds”. My wife - a teacher - used to examine this effect 25 years ago.
A quick Google Scholar search identifies a 1994 paper by Caroline Sharp, Dougal Hutchison and Chris Whetton in the Educational Research journal that states its aim as explaining “the general finding that summer-born children perform less well than their autumn-born classmates”.
It continues: “Autumn-born children tended to perform better than spring- born, and spring-born children, in turn, out-performed summer-borns. The effect was evident in both primary and secondary schooling and persisted into tertiary education, with a higher proportion of autumn-born students graduating from university.”
It appears that we have been unable to do anything about this persistent effect, other than to keep rediscovering it.
Department of geography
University of Cambridge
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now