Staff at the mercy of satisfaction scores

June 12, 2014

As a University of Surrey graduate – and later a professor, member of council and senate, and chair of the academic assembly there – could I say how deeply moved I am to know that it is leading the way in modernising the assessment of its teaching? (“UCU mulls vote of no confidence in Surrey v-c over staff assessments”, News, 29 May.) Lecturers whom students rate below 3.8 out of 5 in questionnaires will in future, it seems, be subject to a “capability meeting”.

Accurate approaches to measuring satisfaction were not available when I was a student there. Some staff, I think, even questioned whether grading teaching would be scientific or valid. There were some pretty quirky views. Lewis Elton, for many years Surrey’s professor of higher education, used to quote Wilhelm von Humboldt: “the teacher is not at the university for the sake of the student; both are there in the service of scholarship”. Thank goodness universities can now rise above this.

Sir Christopher Snowden, Surrey’s vice-chancellor, aims to “secure its position as a top 10 university”. And as Paul Stephenson, the director of human resources, points out, “other leading universities” are doing just the same. So in no time we’ll have dozens of top 10 universities. Everyone will gain!

Apparently Surrey’s University and College Union branch is considering a vote of no confidence in the vice-chancellor. Last year, you reported that the union stopped Surrey from assessing staff on how many of their students received at least a 2:1 grade for their modules (“Surrey considered grade targets for staff appraisals”, 18 July 2013). For some reason, the UCU imagined that this might “distort marking patterns”. How are our leaders to drive up quality if they have to listen to criticism?

A few years ago, Elton suggested that “management and dirigisme” might be “endangering the future of universities”. An unfortunate few, I’m told, still harbour such doubts. The rest of us have learned to love dirigisme. And why not? Our leaders, after all, are always right.

John Holford
Robert Peers chair in adult education
University of Nottingham

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Reader in Politics and Policy

St Marys University, Twickenham

Engineer

Cern

Professor of Anthropology

Maynooth University

Preceptor in Statistics

Harvard University

Postdoctoral Fellowship in Electrochemistry

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework