Speaking the truth to power 1

May 28, 2009

It is important not to impose a restrictive version of academic freedom that hides the power interests driving expert voices behind the veil of peer review ("Don't fear open access", Letters, 21 May). Academic freedom is primarily the freedom to report findings without restriction or threat of punishment. It can be viewed as the duty to speak the truth to power, a duty we as academics have in return for our privileged place in society.

In "reporting" our findings, we apply inductive steps to translate findings produced under ideal, laboratory or context-dependent conditions, to help a wider audience make sense of the world in some way. There is almost no pure "reporting" of findings that have been through peer review, rather those findings are interpreted, often by the academic.

Academic freedom ensures that it is not powerful interests that control what can be reported. Medic and writer Ben Goldacre has fought to make the point that big pharma seeks to control which peer-reviewed drug trials are reported, how they are reported, and who will see the reports, and invests heavily and profitably in doing that.

The best check on powerful interests exclusively determining what is reported is that academics themselves speak freely and reasonably, translating their research from its peer-reviewed context, and reporting their findings to make a wider point about the world. Only by ensuring academic freedom can society be sure it is getting the greatest benefits from the considerable privileges we enjoy as publicly funded intellectuals.

Paul Benneworth, RCUK academic fellow, Newcastle University.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns