Solution, but no problem

May 3, 2012

Unless it can be demonstrated that there is a serious problem to be tackled that would be solved by the issuing of a "concordat", there is no justification for or point to it ("Punishment doesn't fit social sciences crime", 26 April). Even if there were such a problem, it is questionable whether an employer/funder-enforced concordat would be either legitimate or effective.

Aside from this, the concordat should not employ doublespeak: it is not being offered to "assist" the research community; it is a proposed piece of managerial legislation to be applied by employers and funding bodies.

Let's have plain speaking at the very least, no pretence that there would be recognition of individual researchers' or research teams' freedom to choose whether or not they conformed to the concordat.

What is proposed is based upon a fallacious conception of research ethics, with its appeal to "highest standards", "obligations" and so on, and the idea that enforceable commitments could be stated that would apply across all areas of social scientific work. The concept of integrity is itself a complex and contentious one, but there is no acknowledgement of this. The initiative shows little awareness of the thought that social scientists and philosophers have given to the nature of research ethics over the past 50 or so years. In that respect it adds insult to likely injury.

Martyn Hammersley, Professor of educational and social research, The Open University

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show