Scepticism, not gullibility

June 11, 2009

I found your analysis of "conspiracy theories" utterly dispiriting ("They would say that ..." 4 June). Of course there are myriad conspiracy theories, a large percentage of which can be shown to be barking mad. But implicit in your argument is the view that scepticism about official explanations leads to complicity with the proliferation of conspiracy theories.

There is so much evidence for attempts to invalidate questions about officials' actions (MPs' expenses a current example) that it shouldn't be surprising if on occasion such questioning smacks of paranoia.

Wade Mansell, Professor of international law, University of Kent.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments