Roll the credits

January 3, 2003

Martin Ince likened the author list of some scientific papers to the credits of a Hollywood film (Opinion, THES , December 6). Like them, they should specify contributions. This would give credit to whom credit is due and assign responsibility.

The practice can prove useful. The American Physical Society revised its guidelines in response to the falsified data scandal at Bell Labs, New Jersey. All authors of a scientific paper no longer carry full responsibility. But the revision is long and vague. If co-authors were credited with their contributions, then it would be easy to allocate responsibility.

The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors excludes "acquisition of funding, the collection of data or general supervision of the research group" as reasons to be credited. But these are legitimate roles in the creation of scientific knowledge. If people wish to be co-authors and if they are credited with what they did, what harm can come?

Richard Jennings
University of Cambridge

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs

Planning Analyst

St Marys University, Twickenham

PhD Candidate in Political Behaviour

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology - Ntnu