Ranking goldmine

December 2, 2010

I'm surprised that no one at THE has noticed that the magazine is sitting on a mass of unanalysed citation data in its Index.

I'm able to confirm, based on swift and dirty back-of-the-envelope calculations, that the universities of Oxford and Cambridge are mentioned between two and five times more frequently than any other institution in every single issue. I look forward to the compilation of a ranking table based on these data (universities most/least mentioned, perhaps with a list of shame for those never mentioned - poor old University of Poppleton).

The trouble, of course, as with any citation data, is that the figures do not allow the reader to attribute a value to the citation: a given mention may concern university A or B's outstanding research environment, or its appalling widening-participation record.

Mike Baynham, University of Leeds.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October