Qualifying point

May 7, 2009

Tara Brabazon's article on teaching qualifications ("Blind sides", 30 April) misrepresents my recent argument in these pages, no doubt inadvertently. I did not employ a "piquant inversion of logic" because I did not draw the absurd inference she attributes to me that "a lack of (teaching) qualifications leads to good teaching".

I was addressing the Liberal Democrats' proposal to link teaching grant with teaching quality, which assumed that possession of a teaching credential equals good teaching and lack of a credential equals poor teaching. I argued, drawing on experience of some bad but credentialled teachers at school and some uncredentialled but good teachers at university, that having a PGCE does not in itself make one a better teacher than someone who hasn't got one. I suggested no more than that.

Richard Austen-Baker, Lecturer in law, Lancaster University Law School.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments