'Pernicious tosh' of top-up fee defenders 1

April 10, 2008

Gerard Kelly (Leader, 3 April) calls for a debate on top-up fees, but insists that they are "necessary". What about the graduate tax? If I were a student, I would rather know that I would pay tax at a rate of, say, 41 per cent or 42 per cent (rather than 40 per cent) when I started work, than graduate owing £18,000 (assuming top-up fees rise to £6,000 a year). Not only would such a debt be a massive burden in itself, it would also prevent me from saving up a deposit to buy a flat for several years. This is crazy.

Those who claim that increased top-up fees are the only option either lack imagination or are deliberately trying to close down debate in order to promote their own politically motivated agenda.

Pete Dorey, Reader in politics, Cardiff University.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

SETsquared Centre Director

University Of Bristol

Lecturer in Maritime Law, Teaching only

Liverpool John Moores University

AcoRD Officer

University Of Leeds

Marketing and Communication Manager

Heriot-watt University