Partners in pedagogy

October 31, 2013

I read with interest John Colley’s recent article “It’s got to be good” (Opinion, 10 October). While raising important issues, he misses the point on a number of levels.

First, he falls into the positivist trap of viewing student experience surveys as “objective”: I have found them to be anything but. Students can only answer the questions posed to them according to their own biases.

Second, Colley’s argument that student satisfaction with teaching is much the same as satisfaction with consumer products or even patient survival rates is absurd: academic teaching is only one aspect of the learning process in which students themselves have a key part to play.

The article indicates that Colley is viewing the issue according to a paradigm in which students judge teaching rather than their own learning experience, which is fundamental to a genuinely transformative university education. This is a noxious mixture of higher education focused on teaching (as opposed to learning) combined with a consumerist viewpoint.

I have no problem with institutional student experience surveys: they largely reflect the successes and failures of the institutions concerned. However, student surveys of individual teachers often fail to give real indications of what needs improving and the results are largely dependent upon the teacher-student relationship.

The student perspective needs to be engaged - but not to the exclusion of all others. A much better approach would be to scrap faux quantitative teacher/module evaluations and introduce a more qualitative approach in which teachers and students engage in dialogue to identify areas for improvement. While there are issues of power relationships here, experience indicates that they can be overcome: a partnership approach to learning and teaching has often proved to be much more effective.

James Williams
Senior researcher
Social Research and Evaluation Unit
Faculty of Education, Law and Social Sciences
Birmingham City University

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham