Part-timers' partners 1

March 11, 2005

We do not think part-time students are the Cinderellas of higher education ("Everybody deserves a chance to go to the ball", March 4). We agree with Ivor Crewe that this is the impression the Government gives with its failure to introduce support measures for part-timers when top-up fees and bursary packages are introduced for full-timers in 2006.

Here at Teesside University, we have done tremendously well in widening participation and access to higher education. Part-timers now make up 54 per cent of our students.

But we are concerned that if part-time fees were raised in 2006, it would discourage part-time study. To avoid this, we have decided to keep part-time fees close to their current level rather than get involved in a complex system of part-time bursaries. This, however, is a short-term measure. We will continue to lobby for a financial support package for part-timers that mirrors the grants, loans and bursaries being introduced for full-timers from 2006.

Leni Oglesby
Deputy vice-chancellor (academic)
Teesside University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October