Market deficit

November 28, 2013

The letters on the Universities Superannuation Scheme published by Times Higher Education in the past two weeks (“Assets, liabilities and old age tensions”, 14 November; “Equity inequities”, 21 November) illustrate what happens when dodgy economic theories are believed.

We are being told it is wrong to count contributions into the USS as income, on the argument: “What happens…when a company goes bust, so there can be no further contributions?” Which company is being referred to here? The pre-1992 university sector includes many of the world’s greatest (and richest) seats of learning. So it must mean the USS having to be able to cover the possibility of great universities going bust – surely not very likely.

Funding is the elephant in the room of all the discussions about the USS’ sustainability. The argument is that there should be enough marketable assets to cover an estimate of the scheme’s future liabilities. Implementing this rule literally – to comply with the requirements of the unwise legislation in the Pensions Act 2004 – requires schemes to switch their business model from one basis to another without having the cash available to do so.

In common with all defined benefit schemes, the USS is being forced to go from what we might call a “social” cash-in, cash-out model – where each generation of workers’ contributions help guarantee the pensions of the previous, retired one – to a “market” model, where the world is seen only in financial terms and pensions must be pre-funded. This is where the USS “deficit” comes from: it is the result of an ideological change being foisted on us.

It is rather as if it were decreed that mortgages had to be abolished forthwith and that every household had to pay off their existing contract within a year. They would obviously have to find a lot of money to do so.

The idea behind all this is that markets are efficient – a busted flush of an economic theory (see the 2008 crash). Through this ideological prism, the world is seen, not as a long-lived society but as an abstract, timeless market: this induces a kind of neoliberal myopia that leaves believers unable to appreciate the difference between an ancient university and a firm on the edge of bankruptcy.

The USS is only one of many private defined benefit schemes. Many others have been closed because of the rules that imposed this funding logic. It is time the law was changed.

Dennis Leech
Professor of economics
University of Warwick

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Head of E-Assessment Transition

International Baccalaureate

Director

University Of Helsinki

Database Developer / Administrator

Architectural Association School Of Architecture
See all jobs

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together

man with frozen beard, Lake Louise, Canada

Australia also makes gains in list of most attractive English-speaking nations as US slips