Letter: Feel the quality, not the volume 3

January 25, 2002

Surely the underpinning problem with RAE league-table construction, or at least the particular problem identified by the vice-chancellors, is that we are trying to describe and rank, using a single figure of merit, data that actually have two independent dimensions: quality and volume.

Since the unit of assessment results already contain metrics for both, why not extend this into your aggregated league tables?

Any departure from this approach, involving attempts to conflate these two variables, degrades the information source.

Conversely, by using a "double-sided" figure of merit, several institutions could attain the same quality score but still be meaningfully differentiated by the "volume-metric".

The reader would thereby be presented with both the independent pieces of information that are the minimum prerequisite for comparative judgement-making.

Alan Fowler
School of Management
University of Newcastle.

to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments