It adds up to exaggeration

March 13, 2008

Your coverage of our plans to increase the impact of our investments is misleading ("RCUK abandons impact formula"; "What price knowledge?", 6 March). We are interested in retrospectively understanding the impact of our investments in research to establish to what extent the public benefited, for which we make no apology. But we never proposed an algorithm. This is really a case of x + y = z, where x is the newspaper's propensity to exaggerate a story and y is the tendency of not getting all the facts, which when added together equals z, or the wrong end of the stick.

Philip Esler, Chief Executive, Arts and Humanities Research Council, on behalf of Research Council UK.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Universities in most nations are now obliged to prioritise graduate career prospects, but how it should be approached depends on your view of the meaning of education. Academics need to think that through much more clearly, says Tom Cutterham


Featured jobs