In defence of Surrey’s politics department

March 26, 2015

As graduates and current students of the department of politics at the University of Surrey, we are writing to express our concern at reports that the department will, in effect, be closed at the end of this academic year (“Anger as Surrey plans to slash jobs in politics department”, 16 March).

This is a department that is ranked sixth and 17th in The Guardian and The Complete University Guide league tables respectively, one that provided a supportive environment for us to develop and thrive in. The experiences we had have helped us to prosper as graduates and inspired many of us in our chosen career paths. This is testament to the commitment of our teachers, who went above and beyond what was expected of them. The evidence for this can be found in the National Student Survey results, which showed 97 per cent student satisfaction in 2014 among politics students (above the university average of 91 per cent).

We would also like to express concern at how the university management has failed to communicate the full extent and impact of the measures that it is proposing. News of the “restructuring” reached many of us via social media and did not reflect the message from the university’s vice-president, David Ashton, that the changes would be implemented with “disruption to students at an absolute minimum”. For one thing, the university has overlooked the negative impact on the value of a degree from a department now apparently deemed worthy of closure.

On a positive note, the support for Surrey politics has been overwhelming. A “Save Surrey Politics” Facebook page has received more than 2,000 likes, a petition of support has 1,240 signatures and academics at other institutions have been tweeting their support. The most significant development, however, came last week, when the university released a joint statement with the Political Studies Association stating that they were engaged in “discussion on achieving a sustainable department and developing a strategy for the future”. We therefore remain hopeful that the department can be saved.

Mike Blakeney, former vice-president of the University of Surrey Students’ Union
Stavroula Chrona
Jamie Convisser
Samantha Cook
Lucy Dillard
Kenechi Eziefula
Ben Fermor
Paul Follows
Megan Gair
Chris Guerrero
Ciaran Gillespie
Nikolaos Gkotsis Papaioannou
Vanda Green
Samuel Jones
Miriam Kidane
Kandida Purnell
Dhruv Shrada
Alexia Trojan
John Turner
Harriet Oliver
Stephen White
Alex Wilks, Labour parliamentary candidate for East Hampshire
Katharine A. M. Wright

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Profound thanks for your solidarity. It has been my privilege to work with Surrey students with such integrity and organisational and campaigning abilities. Your intervention means a very great deal at a dark time, not merely for Politics at Surrey but for the humanities and social sciences in a higher education sector increasingly focused on business models of education. Professor Marie Breen-Smyth

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard