Halt the expansion of quality bureaucracy

November 20, 2008

Oh dear, it never ends. You report that Roger Brown is calling for the Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) to be given a role in reviewing universities' degree-awarding powers, and for its remit to be widened to cover various other academic decisions ("Former quality chief calls for regular reviews of degree-awarding powers", 13 November).

In other words, let's have yet more bureaucratic empire-building and interference masquerading as a mechanism for ensuring academic standards.

This is the same hackneyed new Labour and QAA mindset that believes you can maintain or enhance academic quality and standards by promoting yet more external administrative meddling in, and micro-management of, academic affairs, and by allowing "suits", rather than experienced professional academics themselves, to determine what constitutes a good degree.

The QAA is now being criticised at all levels across higher education, by academics and vice-chancellors alike, for its crass box-ticking approach to measuring academic standards and conducting audits, along with its ludicrous overreliance on corporate jargon and management-speak, and yet here we have a call for its remit to be widened further still.

Would any private-sector company be able to function if it were subject to the constant external auditing and bureaucratic meddling that universities are now subject to in the name of "accountability"?

I entered academia to teach and do research; not fill in forms and tick boxes for the bureaucrats of the self-serving quality assurance industry.

Pete Dorey, Cardiff University.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns