GPA: imprecise or exact? (1 of 2)

June 30, 2011

The grade-point average system ("'Two tribes' to the wall? Elite set may adopt GPA", 23 June) initially appears to offer greater precision in student assessment. However, there is a danger that employers will replace one crude criterion, for example, getting a 2:1, with a different crude criterion, for example, getting a GPA greater than 3.0.

In this scenario, the classification system is more precise, because the borderline cases between degree classes have been carefully looked at by exam boards, whereas the GPA is a raw average.

A deeper reform of student assessment would aim to evaluate the various incommensurable aspects of student performance and offer a range of measures, both qualitative and quantitative, that represent the diverse achievements of students during their studies at university.

Colin Johnson, University of Kent

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Tef, results, gold, silver, bronze, teaching excellence framework

The results of the 2017 teaching excellence framework in full. Find out which universities were awarded gold, silver or bronze

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan