GPA: imprecise or exact? (1 of 2)

June 30, 2011

The grade-point average system ("'Two tribes' to the wall? Elite set may adopt GPA", 23 June) initially appears to offer greater precision in student assessment. However, there is a danger that employers will replace one crude criterion, for example, getting a 2:1, with a different crude criterion, for example, getting a GPA greater than 3.0.

In this scenario, the classification system is more precise, because the borderline cases between degree classes have been carefully looked at by exam boards, whereas the GPA is a raw average.

A deeper reform of student assessment would aim to evaluate the various incommensurable aspects of student performance and offer a range of measures, both qualitative and quantitative, that represent the diverse achievements of students during their studies at university.

Colin Johnson, University of Kent

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry