Good timing

February 9, 2012

With reference to your article "Scottish head pay control would avoid 'fat cat' slur" (2 February), it might be worth noting the felicitous coincidence of the publication of the review of Scottish university governance - which, among other things, recommends abolishing bonus payments for principals - on the same day as ex-banker Fred Goodwin was stripped of his knighthood and shortly after Royal Bank of Scotland chief Stephen Hester declined his bonus.

This is more than just a public relations exercise, of course: Scottish universities have the opportunity, provided that the recommendations are implemented, to take the lead on matters that are at the core of public debate. This is an example that English universities cannot afford to ignore because, should they do so, it would be at their peril.

Anna Notaro, Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art and Design, University of Dundee

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan