Feuding won't solve FE dilemma 1

September 19, 2003

While I am sympathetic to further education principals' frustration that universities might hijack foundation degrees rather than work in partnership ("FE chiefs air alarm over new degrees", THES , September 12), inconsistent government policy has greatly contributed to the problem.

The widening participation strategy has been seriously undermined by the non-allocation of any significant numbers for student expansion in universities. This occurred after the Higher Education Funding Council for England realised there was already too much natural growth in the system. This has left universities in a position whereby, in supporting partner colleges in developing foundation degrees by validation and numbers from their own contracts, they are robbing their own institution.

I am tired also of hearing that "much of the work-oriented basis for the qualification will be lost" if courses are managed by a university.

The universities with which I am familiar are ex-polytechnics founded to deliver vocational provision and have much experience with sub-degree qualifications. The foundation degrees they are developing arise from their long associations with, for example, schools and nurseries and the health service in preparing and updating their practitioners.

Government ministers who were qualified mainly in the old university sector too often refer to that sector and further education as the two alternatives. They seem oblivious to the distinct nature of new universities.

Much remains to be done at levels 2 and 3 to bridge further and higher education if widening participation is to be achieved and if qualifications such as foundation degrees are to play a full part.

Surely this is a more fruitful focus for further education and higher education partners than feuding.

Freda Tallantyre
Deputy vice-chancellor (academic)
University of Derby

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns