Facts and fiction 1

August 8, 2003

While sympathetic to Catherine Belsey's desire to "end the apartheid" between English and cultural studies (Why I, THES , July 18), a more pressing issue might be to discover what fuels it. As a product of the 1980s "theory revolution", I am amazed that "English" - in its unreconstructed form - still exists. Market and ideological forces are clearly at work. It will be fascinating to see if the cultural theory approach to literature (dependent on a highly competitive "open market" for publications and student recruitment) or more traditional literary scholarship (dependent on university presses and research council funding) wins out.

Lynne Pearce
Lancaster University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

Knowledge Exchange Manager, Innovate

Royal Holloway, University Of London

Accommodation Assistant

Edinburgh Napier University

Customer Service Advisor

Bpp University