Essential training

May 29, 2014

The Mid Staffordshire scandal does not “loom over nursing education”, it looms over society (“The trials of service”, Features, 15 May) and to suggest otherwise blames people for their actions rather than considering the weight of unachievable tasks that society places on many professionals.

I was disappointed to see a lack of critique of the reason why the government wishes to move the training of professionals, including teachers, nurses and social workers, into the workplace and away from universities; the only reason is financial.

The government make a huge assumption that training in the workplace is cheaper and easier because the “trainers” are already doing the job and it is a simple matter of imparting that knowledge and practice to the learners. As all of us working in higher education know – it is not that simple.

A few years ago, one of my first-year nursing students told me and fellow students about an incident. She was on an elderly ward and a gentleman asked her to help him to the lavatory. She did this, supporting him against her as he was very frail. When he got to the lavatory, he died in her arms. The university part of her nursing programme provided her with peer support at the same stage of learning, a knowledge of anatomy and physiology and an understanding of the processes of dying and bereavement. The 50 per cent academic requirement of the programme is absolutely essential for enabling time and resources to assimilate learning from practice and theory.

Nursing, social work and teaching have direct impacts on people’s lives; society’s health, well-being and education depend on these professionals to provide the highest standards of intervention. To do this requires a particular level of education, an evidence and research base from which to draw to ensure best practice and an education of the whole person. Workplaces alone are insufficient to meet these requirements.

All nurses make invaluable contributions to student learning and development, nursing students spend 50 per cent of their programme in practice, but if this became 100 per cent could the NHS cope? Can teachers and social workers undertake their “day job” while researching and publishing? The knowledge and resource base of universities is essential, and to invest in this is an efficient and proper use of funding.

Lyn Wilson
Lecturer, Faculty of Health Sciences
University of Southampton

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together