Essential services

September 26, 2003

To extrapolate from the Effective Approaches report ("Well-being moves up the student retention agenda", THES, September 19) that a "one-stop-shop" model for student services departments will aid retention is a step too far. The issue is far more complex.

Indeed, my reading of the research finds no convincing argument for this approach. Part of the argument for a "one-stop-shop" model seems to be that students are deterred from seeking counselling because they have to go to a specific location. This conflicts with what happens at Sheffield Hallam University. When we were located in a busy joint student services environment, our annual survey consistently revealed that students found coming to a busy place when they were distressed disconcerting and uncomfortable.

So we made changes: we moved to a separate and discreet location. There has been no diminution in demand, and user feedback indicates that students prefer the new discreet location.

Vicky Seddon
Student Services Centre
Sheffield Hallam University

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments