Ends and meanings (2 of 2)

September 20, 2012

Martin Willis' defence of the humanities in the face of the current political bias towards the sciences was eloquent, impassioned and timely. I was puzzled, though, by his stated regret that the phrase "the two cultures" had not yet been "left behind". The two cultures of art and science were in place long before C.P. Snow's 1959 Rede Lecture, and Willis' article itself is based on the (correct) premise that humanistic and scientific study are different in important ways.

Perhaps it is time to reconsider, even to embrace, the model of two distinct cultures that can nonetheless speak to each other across the divide, and to celebrate the idea that the humanities and the sciences, although both driven, as Willis rightly says, by "curiosity and imagination", each have a unique contribution to make to higher education and to society.

Gregory Tate, Lecturer in English literature, University of Surrey

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments