Constructive criticism

November 21, 2013

We were pleased to see Martin Halliwell of the English Association and David Duff of the Council for College and University English make their first public joint announcement in a non-specialist forum (“Not damned, united”, Letters, 14 November). We hope this begins a wider and more fruitful debate.

The letter focuses on their work on government policy consultations, activities we covered in “What happens in the tempest?” (31 October). This is demanding and important work, and we applaud them for doing it. However, they did not begin to address our more substantive and fact-based concerns. For example, what action are they taking on the continuing rows about the place of English in GCSE reform, a subject over which Tristram Hunt and Michael Gove clashed recently? Are the association and the council investigating why English literature is declining in secondary and higher education? How are we to address concerns over English teaching? How are we going to take advantage of the opportunities and avoid the risks of open access?

At this difficult moment, the discipline of English needs to engage urgently in a campaign of consultation, information and culture-building. We make two practical suggestions.

First, that the council and association undertake a comprehensive information-gathering survey of as many members of the higher education English community as possible to ensure that the bodies represent the views of the discipline. Second, that they undertake a campaign of outreach and begin regular communication with academics to rebuild a sense of community and shared purpose. The National Association of Writers in Education, for example, has an excellent regular newsletter, while the Standing Conference of University Drama Departments has a mailing list for information exchange.

Robert Eaglestone, Royal Holloway, University of London
Simon Kövesi, Oxford Brookes University

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

I would like to endorse the concerns outlined by Robert Eaglestone and Simon Kövesi, and to ask that we are not deflected from the issues they raise by internal grievances about misrepresentation regarding roles of CCUE and the English Association. The EA plays a fine role as watchdog at the interface between schools and universities; and CCUE is the forum for English Studies debate. What is needed however is not a merely responsive public analysis role when the government seeks views on policy; but an active and more robust and collective intervention in the public sphere to respond to the frankly alarming developments in our discipline under fire from government prejudicial action and planning. English Studies needs a committed and collective voice now more than ever. Adam Piette, University of Sheffield

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham