Closure is no balm for Open University staff

June 26, 2014

I am one of the people affected by the closure of The Open University’s East Grinstead regional centre (“OU staff express anger over centre closure”, 19 June).

A university spokesman cited the “prohibitive” cost of alternative premises. Staff were told this, but phone calls to East Grinstead estate agents uncovered nearby office space for about 10 per cent cheaper than the annual rent of £80,000 (and that’s before any negotiation). While there are relatively few sizeable, suitable offices in East Grinstead, they are available, and space is cheaper than it is in London, where staff are expected to relocate.

The estimate of 700 jobs being at risk is not unreasonable. Of the 64 staff in East Grinstead, I believe about 40 are “choosing” voluntary severance, rather than opting to move to London with the increased travel time and expense that would entail.

The university has made clear that in the review of English regional offices, only London is “safe” from review. There are about 750 staff working in English regional offices (in East Grinstead, Birmingham, Leeds, Gateshead, Cambridge, Manchester, Oxford, Nottingham and Bristol). If their behaviour follows that of East Grinstead employees, we might expect 500 staff to leave and 250 to have their working lives changed dramatically.

In East Grinstead, many of the people who are likely to opt for voluntary severance are long-serving employees: people with more than 15, 20, even 30 years of service, and who have stayed with The Open University because they believe in its values and the unique opportunities it offers students.

I did smile at the article’s description of staff as “disgruntled” – I don’t think that quite reflects the feeling of employees. I would describe myself as dismayed and deeply concerned – about the working futures of colleagues and about the impact of changes in local provision on our part-time staff (who access staff development and administrative and line management support from East Grinstead) and, of course, on our students, whose uninterrupted support can’t be guaranteed despite the claims of our pro vice-chancellors and our director of student services.

Name and address provided

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham