Built-in obsolescence

March 30, 2007

Much of the debate about the redeployment of postdocs displays a profound ignorance of the structure and mores of the postdoctoral research system.

Because their skills are often highly specialised, postdocs are being trained, and are thus expected, to display a significant element of independence.

The thought that principal investigators will be expected to take on redeployed postdocs who are lacking in these skills should be strangled at birth.

A vibrant system requires regular renewal, and an employment system designed to serve the needs of both service staff and postdocs identically is bound to fail.

A rational university realises that many postdocs will de facto become "redundant" by any narrow definition en route to other careers and, because paying such redundancy is a cost, will simply make this part of the full economic costing.

Flexibility and intelligence are required to make this happen, of course.

Douglas Kell
Manchester University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments