Awkward allocations

January 15, 2015

I take issue with the headline attributing a claim of “ineffectiveness” against the Economic and Social Research Council to me (“REF analysis highlights ESRC’s ineffective grant allocation, says scholar”, News, 8 January). The block grant allocation is not “ineffective” but “procedurally problematic”. However, the article rightly raises important issues about the appropriate procedures and criteria used by research councils in allocating block grant funding such as the new ESRC Impact Acceleration Accounts.

The concern is that under pressure to save costs, research councils are preferring simplicity of administration over appropriately tailored judgements of excellence. This includes funding smaller numbers of large awards at the expense of large numbers of smaller awards – which may potentially yield more cost-effective impacts – on the logic that the latter model costs more to administer.

The termination of the peer-reviewed Knowledge Exchange Opportunities Scheme in favour of IAA block grants has resulted in the replacement of an open and competitive funding stream with a closed allocation to selective institutions on an uncertain logic subject to no peer review. This is a worrying trend, more so in the light of the research excellence framework results, which suggest that impact excellence in the social sciences often lies outside of those institutions awarded IAAs.

Contrary to the claims of the “spokesman for the ESRC”, REF assessments were not solely concerned with “who has historically produced good impact”, but also included a significant judgement on the quality of institutional strategies for securing impact excellence in the future via the “impact template”, which constituted 20 per cent of the impact score.

More generally, I believe that the REF results and the burden of the exercise on the academic community should prompt a wide-ranging reassessment of research funding in the UK and the relationship between the two sides of the dual support system.

Adam Crawford
Pro-dean for research and innovation
Faculty of Education, Social Sciences and Law
University of Leeds

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard