Appropriate accommodation?

May 15, 2014

Martin McQuillan (“Selective hearing”, Features, 8 May) ignores those facts about the student occupations at the University of Sussex that do not fit his narrative. For instance, in March last year several thousand people were called to a demonstration in support of the occupation through posters that invited them to “fuck things up”. Subsequently, a number of protesters smashed glass doors, burned records, wrecked furniture, intimidated staff and stole cash and personal property from desks. I doubt that he would tolerate such acts at Kingston University or that he would consider such behaviour “idealistic”.

John Duffy
Registrar and secretary
University of Sussex

 

Martin McQuillan states the choices for universities clearly. They can either develop as consumer organisations that must recognise student concerns (at least to some extent) to survive. Or they can develop as authoritarian regimes that massage student opinion to retain their privileges. Neither path is delightful. But at present, as they are not resolving this dilemma, they will be caught on its horns.

Stephen Haggard
Via timeshighereducation.co.uk

 

It’s right to warn of the managerialist co-option of the student voice (“The students are no longer revolting”, Feature, 8 May), where obedient students are encouraged to speak but are not necessarily listened to. But I can’t agree with Joanna Williams and Jennie Bristow when they say: “For students, the aspiration to be the intellectual equals of their lecturers and critically engaged in the search for new knowledge or the reinterpretation of existing knowledge is entirely laudable. But this should be a privilege students earn after having engaged in an intellectual struggle to master the foundations of a discipline.” (My emphasis.)

It is a right for students: the right to be agents of their own development, the right to be “partners, co-creators and experts” involved with “training staff in new skills…designing curricula and resources – negotiating examination questions…setting assignments, redesigning module provision and delivery”, to adopt the language of the Quality Assurance Agency.

The latter may well be said in managerialist bad faith, but that doesn’t make it wrong per se.

Julian Wells
Via timeshighereducation.co.uk

 

Martin McQuillan says occupations distract students from their primary purpose – study. I disagree. I spent significant periods of my first degree course in occupation of college premises. It taught me skills of organising, public speaking and publicity that I would not have learned in lectures and that have stayed with me since.

Keith Flett
London

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest