Adversarial uncertainty (1 of 3)

August 16, 2012

John Radford ("Precise definitions", Letters, 2 August) is correct in his general thesis. However, his example of the slight contretemps between Holmes and Moriarty at the Reichenbach Falls ("The Final Problem", 1893) is somewhat premature in its judgement. Some 120 years after the (alleged) incident, the jury still appears to be out as to who, if anyone, was the "nemesis" of whom.

We are not helped on such serious matters by the ambivalence of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.

Iain Smith, Honorary fellow, University of Strathclyde

Please
or
to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Sponsored

Featured jobs

Lecturer in Marketing (Education)

Kings College London

Research Fellow in Solar Physics

Northumbria University

Research Associate

Technische Universitat Dresden (tu Dresden)