A little less conversation

June 26, 2014

Given the absence of any explanation from the University of Warwick for Thomas Docherty’s suspension (“Employer gags critic of ‘authoritarian’ sector”, News, 19 June), the suspicion must be that he is being disciplined for expressing his views.

What I find incredible is that the university’s powers now apparently extend to determining with whom an academic may or may not socialise with off campus (“It is understood that as a condition of Professor Docherty’s suspension he is not allowed any contact with his students or colleagues”, the article states).

What is the legal basis for this? And why hasn’t anybody challenged it or remarked on its oddity? Have we all become so fearful that we will suffer any humiliation in order to keep our jobs, including letting our employers dictate the company we keep?

Derek Sayer
Via www.timeshighereducation.co.uk

 

I spoke at the conference Warwick University Ltd: Lessons from 1970 and the Higher Education Sector Today, which Thomas Docherty was prevented from addressing. The event offered a number of interesting echoes of Warwick University Ltd: Industry, Management and the Universities [E. P. Thompson’s edited work on university-business links], but the lesson is one for now.

The most important freedom is the liberty to criticise power, and it seems that at Warwick, and in many other universities, being critical of management is a freedom too far.

The sorts of management strategies being used across the sector now reflect the assumption that universities are businesses. Freedom of speech becomes subordinated to commercial interests. In other words, you are free to say anything as long as you agree with us.

Martin Parker
Via www.timeshighereducation.co.uk

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns