UCS sets 2020 goal to achieve gender balance

Provost says university’s size will help it hit a ‘moral’ target of 50 per cent women across its professoriate and board

May 7, 2015

Source: Getty

Progress: women move up the ladder

A UK higher education institution has committed to having at least 50 per cent women across its board of directors, its executive team and its professors and senior lecturers by 2020.

University Campus Suffolk said that it was making the achievement of gender parity in senior positions one of its main aims for the next five years.

Launching the institution’s strategy document, 2020 Vision, Richard Lister, provost and chief executive of UCS, told Times Higher Education that the institution was ideally placed to lead on the issue.

“We don’t carry decades of history that make it difficult for us [to make changes]. We are an institution with a majority of women students and a majority of women staff, and senior levels should reflect that. It seems to me to be an absolute no-brainer,” he said.

Currently, 55 per cent of the institution’s managers and 53 per cent of its senior lecturers are women, Mr Lister said, but there were challenges to overcome with regard to its professoriate and its board.

He said that UCS had begun to build a “pipeline of talent” to ensure that the equal representation at lower levels filtered up to senior positions.

“We have set up a new layer of associate professor, and that makes it easier to take the relatively large number of women we have at senior lecturer level and work with them to get them to associate professor…[and potentially] to full professorial level,” he said.

He pointed out that just 14 per cent of UK vice-chancellors are women, only one in five professors is female and, at some institutions, just one in 10 academics at professorial level is a woman.

However, Mr Lister said that he was “not for a moment having a pop” at other institutions.

“Clearly, other institutions have got further to go…and because of their size and scale, they will find the transition process takes them longer,” he said. “The fact we are relatively new means we have flexibility. It is simply the right thing to do morally and as a business, and it is achievable.”


Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October