Sinister buttocks? Roget would blush at the crafty cheek

Middlesex lecturer gets to the bottom of meaningless phrases found while marking essays

八月 7, 2014

Source: Kobal

Behind the name: ‘Roget-ing’ describes the creation of absurd phrases

The academic who came across baffling phrases such as “bequest mazes”, “Herculean liturgies” and “sinister buttocks” in a student paper was left scratching his head for a while.

Then it dawned on him: it was the product of what he now calls “Rogeting” – the creation of new meaningless phrases through the thoughtless and ill-considered use of a Roget’s Thesaurus, generally to hide plagiarised material.

Chris Sadler, principal lecturer in business information systems at Middlesex University, suggested the neologism after spotting several potential “Rogetisms” in a student’s piece of work.

After reading that “common mature musicians [and] recent liturgy providers are looking to satisfy…Herculean personalised liturgies”, Mr Sadler attempted to trace the sentence’s origin, suspecting that the nonsense had been generated through extensive synonym swapping.

“Even if the sentence had made sense, it seemed out of place in [a paper on] business information systems and I was motivated to seek out the source,” he said.

He eventually located the original text, which read: “the current big players and new service providers are looking to supply more powerful personalised services.”

Mr Sadler added that he had “seen quite a bit” of “Roget-ing”, which he described as “disguising plagiarism by substituting synonyms, one word at a time with no attempt to understand either the source or target text”.

Other new phrases coined via the splendidly inept process include “bequest mazes”, a rough translation of “legacy networks”, a term used to describe web networks using outdated computer formats.

To “stay ahead of the competition” became the quaint “to tarry fore of the conflict”, while “new market leaders” was turned into “modern store guides”.

Sadler’s favourite Rogetism, however, is a rendering of the phrase “left behind”, which was marvellously converted into “sinister buttocks”.

“This was a sad business for me and especially [for] my student, but I do think ‘sinister buttocks’ deserves a prize,” said Mr Sadler, who entered the student mistake for this year’s Times Higher Education exam howlers.

In light of Mr Sadler’s experience, any student tempted to deploy Roget’s Thesaurus in future might well heed the counsel of horror writer Stephen King in his guide to good writing.

“Any word you have to hunt for in a thesaurus is the wrong word,” he advised, adding “there are no exceptions to this rule”.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

Please Login or Register to read this article.

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

"new market leaders” / “modern store guides” It would also be interesting to know if the writer had a German language background, given that "Führer" is a translation of both "leader" and "guide"
They probably haven't used a thesaurus, they've probably used translation software e.g. a Google translation of the article into English from another language (German perhaps as per the previous comment).