Sheffield strikers lose more pay for not rearranging teaching

University claims staff are in breach of contract for failing to reorganise lectures lost during recent industrial action

Published on
January 21, 2026
Last updated
January 21, 2026
Close up of a sign for the University of Sheffield, with The Diamond building,
Source: iStock/georgeclerk

The University of Sheffield has been accused of bullying after telling staff they will face further pay deductions for not rescheduling teaching missed during industrial action.

University and College Union (UCU) members at Sheffield say they are facing “double deductions” after holding 16 days of strike action across November and December over plans announced by the university to make staff savings of £23 million, which the union has argued would equate to about 400 job losses.

As part of the action, members also committed to not rescheduling lectures or classes cancelled because of the disruption.

The university has now written to staff to tell them that any academic who has not rescheduled the lost teaching will be docked the entirety of their pay for three weeks, starting on 19 January, on top of the wages already docked for the strike days.

ADVERTISEMENT

It means that any staff member who participated in the full strike action and has not rescheduled teaching will lose a total of 31 days of pay.

In an email seen by Times Higher Education, Sheffield told staff that if they are “not ready and willing to fulfil the full requirements of your job role and replace missed teaching as expected…you will therefore be in breach of your contract”.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In line with the university’s position on partial performance, 100 per cent of your pay will be withheld for the entirety of this period.”

Any work that staff choose to do during the three-week period will be considered “voluntary”, it adds.

David Hayes, chair of Sheffield’s UCU branch, described the announcement as “disproportionate and punitive”, and said it is “very frustrating that this is the route that they’re going to go down”.

“It is extremely unclear to me why this is allowed to happen. They’ve already deprived us of the money that we would have got for teaching this material anyway during the strike action,” he said. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s just bullying tactics from a university that doesn’t have a better answer to the dispute that we’re in,” Hayes added.

A spokesperson for Sheffield said it respected the “right of staff members to strike and understand this decision is not taken lightly”.

“However, staff who take strike action are not fulfilling their contractual duties and, because of this, will not be paid for the days they do not work. This is standard practice in any sector.”

They said that staff choosing not to replace teaching that was disrupted were “not fulfilling their contractual duties and so pay will be withheld in line with our long-established policy”.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our approach follows Office for Students expectations for institutions during industrial action that we are expected to adhere to and is focused on ensuring students receive the education they are entitled to with minimal disruption,” the spokesperson added.

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducataion.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (7)

The U and the S are in a contractual relationship governed by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. If the ‘trader’ (the U) fails to provide the ‘service’ (teaching and assessment) to the ‘consumer’ (the S) in a ‘timely’ fashion (including some leeway for the service to be delivered late but still within a reasonable time) the U becomes liable to make a part refund of the ‘price’ (tuition fees) charged for the ‘service’ - and hence the U might wish to seek to recover its refund/compensation payments made to ‘0000s of Ss by lawfully deducting pay from ‘000s of academics who have breached their employment contracts. It is worth bearing in mind that an employer can refuse to accept partial performance and hence can deduct full pay even if the employee offered to complete other tasks except the belated/rescheduled delivery of teaching. The UCU brought - and lost - a court case about pay being deducted from academics taking industrial action and so UCU members should have been made aware of the risks of losing pay if they take such action.
Universities are entitled to withhold pay for strike days. If the provisions regarding the calling of industrial acrion are carried out workers in HE are allowed to strike. Striking is of course a breach of contarct but provided legal procedures are followed, workers are protected from dismissal. If the staff have had full pay for the relevant strike period deducted (including pension payments) then it is unreasonable to request that they rearrange the missed classes and lectures as there would be no point in taking the action in the first place. If the rail unions strike on certain days, they don't return to work and run the lost services on top of their current services do they? The work done on those days gave been lost and they have to face the consequences. I understand the arguments behind the University not accepting the partial fulfilment of duties and deduct full pay for the period in question, but strikes work by the withdrawing of labour. Of course, in theory, the University could request staff not striking to cover the classes lost by striking workers. It can be awkward of course if one is not teaching on the specific strike day, which always seemed to be the case with me, but strikes for non 9-5 workplace occupations are verty tricky, especially when union membership is patchy.
The law is clear … employees have the right to strike, but the employer has the right to determine what employees do when they are not striking.
No they are not fascist dictators, although they like to act like them. They are also bound by law to what is reasonable. Like most things, UCU should take this to judicial review if employers are acting unreasonably.
As someone whose daughter has been affected by this action (4 weeks of strikes before Christmas and now staff being locked out afterwards), I am bitterly disappointed with her experience at Sheffield. She was so excited about joining the University, but now wants it to be over. The communication from all parties has been dismal, and whilst many of her friends' teaching has gone ahead as normal, none of hers has.
Well yes this is the point, while union membership is patchy the effects of strike action are indiscriminate and arbitrary. In a dept where union membership is high studeent lose teaching, where it is low, teaching goes ahead. Where is the fairness? One also suspects that Union membership is higher in those areas where staff employment is most under threat.
new
Yes, thank you, I understand this and it is a point well made. I assume this will also be reflected in the NSS scores over the next couple of years.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT