‘Lack of student awareness’ holding back degree apprenticeships

UUK report urges government to promote ‘earn while you learn’ courses to meet student, parent and employer enthusiasm

July 15, 2019

The UK’s degree apprenticeship system is being undermined by “poor levels of awareness” among school pupils, parents and employers, says a new report.

The Future of Degree Apprenticeships, published by Universities UK on 15 July, which includes the results from a survey of around 750 school students and from focus groups, calls on the government to reform the system so that many more people can become degree apprentices.

Such apprenticeships combine vocational training with academic study. Apprentices “earn while they learn”, working four days a week and spending one day in university.

Four out of every five school pupils in years 10 and 12 (81 per cent) surveyed said they knew “little” or “nothing at all” about the application process for degree apprenticeships, while just seven per cent knew about their course structures.

Likewise, an Education Select Committee report on value for money in higher education found a “woeful lack of careers advice and awareness” about the degree apprenticeship option, said the committee’s chair, Robert Halfon MP.

But focus groups showed parents and pupils were “enthusiastic” when they did find out more about such apprenticeships, the UUK report said.

The benefits of these courses should be “trumpeted in our schools and colleges” and the government should make “every effort to champion their expansion”, Mr Halfon said.

Currently there are 7,000 degree apprentices in England and more than 100 universities delivering or ready to deliver such degree courses.

Alistair Jarvis, UUK’s chief executive, said the courses are starting to have a “significant impact” on sectors with skills shortages such as digital technology, nursing, policing, and teaching, and that their benefits are “too great to keep secret”.

“Government must take the lead in promoting these and in reforming the system so more people know about degree apprenticeships and can do them,” he added.

The report recommends that the government should lead a campaign to promote the benefits of such apprenticeships, including providing better careers information at an earlier age in schools.

Ucas should make the application system for degree apprenticeships as “straightforward” as it is for undergraduate degrees, the report also says.

There should also be government investment in initiatives supporting those in underrepresented groups to take up degree apprenticeships, it argues.

A majority of employers (89 per cent) said that degree apprenticeships attracted high-calibre learners and that degrees equip them with the knowledge and skills needed in a “rapidly-changing economy”.

But the “levels of bureaucracy” in the system do not make it easy for employers and universities to provide such apprenticeships, added Mr Jarvis.

“It’s time to strip this back and put the needs of employers at the heart of the degree apprenticeship system," he said.

nick.mayo@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

Reader's comments (2)

"Currently there are 7,000 degree apprentices in England and more than 100 universities delivering or ready to deliver such degree courses." Still a tiny percentage of all graduates or Higher Level Apprenticeships but steady growth will increase awareness. Great deal for levy payers and students but not much in it for Micro Businesses. Danger that high total cost of Government subsidy will adversely affect funds for level 3 and 4 qualifications.
SMEs who do not pay the levy can still get a 90% rebate of the fees from the government... and it's a very effective way for a small company to get high-quality training for one or two people without losing them for long periods of study time!

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October