How is eLife measuring up?

In 2012, the open access biomedical journal eLife was launched to challenge the dominance of titles such as Nature, Science and Cell

六月 16, 2016
How is eLife measuring up? infographic (16 June 2016)

View high-resolution version


This month, eLife’s backers – the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Max Planck Society and the Wellcome Trust – said that they would extend support until 2022 with a £25 million boost.

Four years on, how is eLife doing?

It is now publishing as many papers as Nature, with acceptance rates falling from more than one in four when it was set up to about 15 per cent last year.

Along with many other academic critics, eLife rejects the use of journal impact factors, which measure the average number of citations papers receive. However, the measure remains watched by some researchers hoping for promotion, and on this count, eLife remains behind Nature.

Science declined to give year-by-year breakdowns for acceptance rates and papers published. A spokeswoman said that about 800 papers were published each year, and 6 to 7 per cent of submissions were accepted. Science’s journal impact factor has remained in the low 30s throughout the period.

david.matthews@tesglobal.com

后记

Print headline: Taking stock: how is eLife measuring up?

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多