Admission statement

十一月 12, 1999

I sensed no hostility from delegates to the new post-16 qualifications at the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals conference ("Admissions officers dig in heels on A levels", THES, November 5).

Admissions staff have always made their own decisions on entry based on the academic requirement of the course and have for many years accepted broad-based qualifications.

All of the many admissions staff I have been in contact with as chair of the admissions working group of the Higher Education Liaison Officers Association have welcomed the breadth of study offered by the new qualifications and the certification of key skills vital to success in higher education and employment. It is understandable that staff who will not be required to select students on the basis of the reforms until the 2002 cycle, and who have to cope with a research assessment exercise before that, have yet to develop detailed requirements for entry.

Educational liaison officers, on the other hand, are working hard to provide guidance to year-11 students. The picture emerging is that HEIs will welcome breadth as demonstrated by taking four subjects at A/S level or equivalent in year 12, but also require evidence of depth of study by looking for at least two of these subjects to be continued to A level or GNVQ in year 13. Evidence of competence in key skills will be welcomed, but whether this will be considered as part of the offer remains to be seen.

John Wright, Educational liaison coordinator, University of Surrey

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多