Companies offered ethics advice

April 7, 1995

A new centre at De Montfort University is offering to help companies check that they are developing their information systems in a socially responsible manner.

Simon Rogerson, director of the Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility said: "One of the things we think organisations should be undertaking is some sort of ethical audit." The centre's launch coincided with last week's Ethicomp 95 conference.

Delegates from 14 countries agreed in principle to set up a global network of centres to develop the debate and provide information on socially responsible computing. Mr Rogerson is working on this with Terrell Ward Bynum, director of the Research Center on Computing and Society at Southern Connecticut State University.

Ethical audits are likely to concentrate on "ethical hot spots" which arise along the way from a company's mission statement to its implementation of computer systems. One such hot spot is the negotiation between users and management over the cost and capabilities of a new system. This often involves extensive political manoeuvreing, according to Mr Rogerson.

The centre will examine the impact of communications on work and the workplace. Besides core ethical issues such as privacy, fraud and obscenity, the researchers will examine broader issues of social responsibility, including the devaluing of jobs and the possible emergence of a gulf between information haves and have-nots.

Mr Rogerson said that the centre will embark on a programme of research, consultancy, education and training which will stimulate debate and help to ensure these issues are kept high on the agenda of goverment, industry and commerce.

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October