You ain't seen nothing yet 1

四月 15, 2010

As a follow-up to "Phone book et al: one paper, 45 references, 144 authors" (News, 8 April), I wanted to alert readers to an even more gross example than the gross it cites.

In 1998, I responded to a challenge posed by New Scientist magazine to find the most-authored paper so far, and came across "The HOPE (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) Study: the design of a large, simple randomised trial of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) and vitamin E in patients at high risk of cardiovascular events", featured in the February 1996 issue of The Canadian Journal of Cardiology. In total, it had 718 authors! How is it possible for there to be so many (real) contributors?

Rob Eason, University of Southampton.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.