Valid definitions? 1

七月 25, 2003

The article "Quality audit queries OU-validated degrees" ( THES, July 18) about the Quality Assurance Agency audit of our Danish partnership misses the real significance of the report's findings. The key issue is the QAA's disregard for the implications of accreditation, as defined in its "code of practice" and widely used by UK universities.

The Open University has been in dialogue with the QAA since the audit. We believe that its conclusions are unsound, but most of all we urge the agency to stand by its own definition of accreditation rather than to suggest that there are no circumstances in which a providing institution can be given "wide authority" or where an awarding institution can justify "limited control over the quality assurance function". We believe that not to do so will impoverish opportunities for collaborative activity for UK universities and their partners.

Kate Clarke
Open University validation services

Paul Clark
Pro vice-chancellor (learning and teaching)
Open University

Please login or register to read this article.




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments