No to pension change

July 21, 2006

University and College Union members in post-1992 institutions are being balloted on proposed changes to their pensions.

These changes will have a detrimental effect on future academics and set up a two-tier workforce. The pension changes are another expression of neoliberal "reforms" that are aimed at turning UK higher education into a commodity.

The implications for those of us who work in higher education are a further erosion of autonomy in our jobs, a weakening of our working conditions, increased management control and longer working lives.

Trade unionism is based on standing together and not being divided - after all, unity is strength. For all of these reasons I advise that UCU members in post-1992 institutions vote "no" in the ballot and defend all our pension rights, present and future.

Stewart Smyth Manchester Metropolitan University Business School

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October