No to pension change

July 21, 2006

University and College Union members in post-1992 institutions are being balloted on proposed changes to their pensions.

These changes will have a detrimental effect on future academics and set up a two-tier workforce. The pension changes are another expression of neoliberal "reforms" that are aimed at turning UK higher education into a commodity.

The implications for those of us who work in higher education are a further erosion of autonomy in our jobs, a weakening of our working conditions, increased management control and longer working lives.

Trade unionism is based on standing together and not being divided - after all, unity is strength. For all of these reasons I advise that UCU members in post-1992 institutions vote "no" in the ballot and defend all our pension rights, present and future.

Stewart Smyth Manchester Metropolitan University Business School

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October