Letter: Researchers aren't the only elite 2

November 30, 2001

When John Henry Newman wrote in 1850, a university was an elite of scholars freely assembled to undertake teaching and scholarship, with perhaps some reference to crown and church for patronage. I think Conrad Russell had that image in mind last week ("Universities drowning under dual tidal waves", THES , November 23).

Universities in 2001, however, are big players in a mass further and higher education system. Academics teach, research, consult, counsel, transfer knowledge, lead professional bodies, engage in entrepreneurship and help drive the local economy. Tens of thousands of academics are involved, with multiple sources of funding, not just the Treasury.

Both models of higher education are internally consistent, but elements are not interchangeable. The UK cannot afford the volume of the latter with the style of the former, which would exclude me as an engineer.

Michael J. Kelly
Director, Centre for Solid State Electronics
University of Surrey

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October