Letter: Generic aspirations?

November 9, 2001

Sam Leinster states that the titles of nurse and doctor will become obsolete in the brave new world of healthcare because practitioners will be identified not by professional label but by their competences ("An unconventional treatment", THES , October 26) While few would disagree with sharing aspects of professional education and loosening professional boundaries, there are two disadvantages.

First, a professional title is useful shorthand for knowing what competences a staff member has in the hurly-burly world of healthcare delivery where staff and patients are constantly changing. It is the basis of teamwork and helps to maintain high standards.

Second, professional titles and the associated skills are powerful recruitment incentives. Young people are attracted to careers in the health service because they want to be doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, midwives and all that that entails. They do not come aspiring to be multi-tasking generic healthcare workers.

Claire Hale
Professor of clinical nursing
University of Leeds

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October