Flexible friend?

December 10, 2004

Sandra Burslem prattles on about how much she "values" her students, mature ones especially, and that universities should do more to encourage flexible working ("Do more for older students, v-c says", November 19).

Last year, a student at Manchester Metropolitan University sent Dame Sandra a letter protesting against the exploitation of a part-time lecturer. This man began his academic career as a mature student at MMU, did a degree and PhD there, then worked as an hourly paid tutor for 11 years.

He put himself out for the students again and again, much like the lecturer Dame Sandra describes who helped her get to where she is today. He did more teaching hours than most full-time staff and earned roughly £10,000 a year - not enough to pay his rent.

Fourteen other students added their names to the letter. Dame Sandra did not respond. The lecturer has since returned to working for the Post Office because it pays better. If Dame Sandra believes universities should "do more" for students, perhaps she could set an example by responding to the letter. If she values flexible teaching, perhaps her institution should not have been so callous and inflexible towards a tutor who did everything she calls for in terms of supporting students and only wanted in exchange to earn a wage comparable to that of other lecturers.

Simon Lavery

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October