Facts and fluff

八月 29, 2003

Alice Farrands uses questions about Iraqi weapons to argue not that scientists can easily be caught in the political crossfire, but that "their ostensibly technical advice is inflected by their own world view and vested interests" ("It's just politics in a lab coat", THES , August 22).

Either Iraq had usable chemical and biological weapons or it did not. Such weapons either could or could not be deployed in 45 minutes.

What we need is not "a sea change in a culture that extols the neutrality of science" but a rejection of woolly minded relativism unwilling to distinguish facts from fluff.

David Voas
University of Sheffield

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.