Back PhDs everywhere

March 11, 2005

The Higher Education Funding Council for England is phasing out funding for PhD students in departments with units of assessment ranked 3a ("Funding fillip for further study", March 4). Now it can give more cash to the so-called research intensive universities and forget postgraduate research education in the rest.

Since the last research assessment exercise, my 3a biology department has won substantial funding from research councils, industry and research council studentships, which unlike Hefce funding are awarded under evidence-based schemes. One can only interpret Hefce's policy as an attempt to further stifle the development of research in the lower rated departments in the run-up to the next RAE.

PhD students should be funded wherever there is high-quality supervision, training and research.

Chris Hawes
Oxford Brookes University

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。




  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论


Log in or register to post comments


Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October