Let’s frame preparation as an academic skill

Two small habits have stayed with me in life. Backing into a parking space takes a little more effort now but makes departure smoother later. Aligning shoes by the door before leaving the house prepares the next step in advance. Both are acts of anticipation – doing something in the present with the future self in mind. I notice the same logic, or its absence, in my students every week.

I teach in a multicultural setting where students arrive with very different habits around learning – different relationships with time, space and academic routine. What looks like disengagement is often something more specific: students who have not yet learned to prepare the environment in which learning can take place.

• Six tips on helping your students improve their teamwork skills
• Are your students disengaging – or is it their personality type?
• Being a beginner is hard. Let’s make it easier for our students

In class, some students are ready the moment a task is introduced. Others must first find the right file, close unrelated tabs or locate their notes. It’s easy to read this as a motivation gap. But I have come to see it as a preparation gap – and one that educators can directly address.

What research tells us

Self-regulated learning is often treated as a cognitive skill: planning, monitoring, reflecting. But thinking does not happen only inside the mind – it unfolds across the tools, materials and environments surrounding us, according to research into distributed cognition. Notes, folder structures, screen layouts and even seating choices become part of how students think.

Plus, students who act with a longer time horizon tend to break tasks into stages, prepare materials before urgency builds and anticipate obstacles before they become crises, shown in studies into future time perspectives. Those operating primarily in the present tense respond to pressure rather than getting ahead of it. In diverse classrooms, these patterns are shaped not only by individual habit but by prior educational culture – making them all the more important to name explicitly rather than assume.

When students repeatedly struggle to start and no one names preparation as a teachable behaviour, they often draw the wrong conclusion: that the problem is personal inadequacy rather than an undeveloped skill.

Four practical steps

Build a set-up moment into every session. Begin class by asking students to open the relevant material, clear unrelated tabs and have their notes in front of them before you speak. Keep it brief – 60 seconds is enough. What matters is the framing: this is part of the academic work, not a preamble to it. In multicultural classrooms especially, making the routine explicit removes ambiguity about what “being ready” actually means.

Name organised behaviour when you see it. When a student arrives with annotated readings or a prepared outline, say so: “That’s a good example of preparing the conditions for analysis.” Naming it turns an invisible habit into a visible model. Students who have never thought of preparation as a skill begin to see it as one.

Stage your assignments. Build preparation steps into the assessment itself: a materials checklist, a brief outline or a folder structure submitted alongside the final piece. This communicates that anticipatory planning is part of academic competence – not a private habit some students happen to have.

Shift the diagnostic question. When a student is slow to engage, ask: “Is everything you need in front of you?” before assuming disengagement. The barrier is often environmental – a missing file, a cluttered screen, an uncomfortable seat. Fixing the environment is faster than motivating through it, and it signals that you see preparation as a shared responsibility.

The body in space

My physiotherapy background makes me attentive to the physical dimension of this. Some students consistently choose seats at the edge of a row or against a wall. When group work compresses that space unexpectedly, their attention shifts inward – towards monitoring proximity, rather than engaging with the task. This is not preference; it is a cognitive response to spatial pressure. Designing room arrangements with this in mind, and checking in before rearranging students, costs very little and preserves a great deal.

How students move through transitions also reveals their relationship with preparation. A student who pauses at the door before entering late is calculating impact before acting – the same anticipatory logic as backing into a parking space. Recognising these micro-behaviours as strategic, and reflecting that back to students, helps them see their own habits as something to develop rather than just something they do.

The shift worth making

We ask students to work independently, manage their time and take responsibility for their learning. What we ask far less often is: have we actually taught them how to prepare the space in which that learning happens?

In multicultural classrooms, where students carry different prior experiences of academic structure, this gap is especially consequential. Preparation looks different across cultures and disciplines. Making it explicit, teachable and part of your course design is one of the most direct investments you can make in student autonomy – not as an add-on, but as part of what it means to teach well.

Meeyoung Kim is assistant professor at the College of Life Sciences, University of Sharjah.

Author’s note: I used generative AI to assist with structural refinement and editing; all core ideas, arguments and examples are my own.

If you would like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the Campus newsletter.