What are you reading?

A weekly look over the shoulders of our scholar-reviewers

April 30, 2009

Geoffrey Alderman is Michael Gross professor of politics and contemporary history, University of Buckingham. He is reading Norman Rose: A Senseless, Squalid War: Voices from Palestine 1945-1948 (Vintage, 2009) – “ a compelling account of the end of the British Mandate for Palestine”.

Jerome de Groot is lecturer in Renaissance literature and culture, University of Manchester. He is reading Helen Pierce: Unseemly Pictures: Graphic Satire and Politics in Early Modern England (Yale University Press, 2008) – “It is a very good and brilliantly illustrated work with some very useful insights into material culture and satire in the 17th century” – and Makeover Television: Realities Remodelled, edited by Dana Heller (I. B. Tauris, 2007), “for an article I’m writing about diet television – it outlines the key issues associated with what is increasingly the most important hybrid reality-TV genre”.

Johan Franzén, who teaches Middle East history at the School of Oriental and African Studies, is reading Michael Freeden: Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach (Oxford University Press, 1996) – “a very interesting and theoretically sound book”.

Shelley King is associate professor, department of English, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario. She is reading Ricki Stefanie Tannen: The Female Trickster: The Mask that Reveals – Post-Jungian and Postmodern Psychological Perspectives on Women in Contemporary Culture (Routledge, 2007). “I’m working on Philip Pullman’s Lyra as a trickster figure, so this study presenting a specifically postmodern female trickster offers a new perspective on the traditional trickster type.”

Deborah Rogers is professor of English, University of Maine. “To justify my existence, I am reading several books that attempt to prop up literary studies and the fate of the humanities,” she says. These include Rita Felski’s Uses of Literature (Wiley-Blackwell, 2008) and Bruce Fleming’s What Literary Studies Could Be, and What It Is (University Press of America, 2008).

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs