The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games by Jesper Juul

Steve Redhead takes a byte from a fascinating but flawed analysis

April 4, 2013

Why do we play games when we know they make us unhappy? Video games in particular, that is, but games and sport in general, too. Analysis of video games has been an integral part of the theorising of the creative industries since the late 1990s when the term was introduced into more general historical debates about creative arts and cultural industries. They are always on the list of creative industries to be “mapped” when audits of culture are called for by government or local authorities. Indeed, some cities depend on them for their image of creativity.

But in this short book, which is part of the publisher’s Playful Thinking series and contains many lovingly presented examples of video games in black and white, the creative industries’ perspective is eschewed in favour of a discourse on play, games and Johan Huizinga, the Dutch play theorist. There is a rich tradition of literature in sport and leisure studies exploring play, and indeed the notion of gaming, but this book hardly scratches its surface. This is a pity, because much of that particular literature pre-dates the invention of video games as popular culture. There is considerable conflict today about whether video games are “art”, and galleries promoting this notion have been heavily criticised by traditionalists and conservatives. Jesper Juul is definitely on the side of the modernisers and progressives, and explores video gaming and play in order to probe further what he calls the “art of failure”.

Video games’ deep connections to militarism and to developments in military technology find no resonance here

The frame of that notion, which pervades Juul’s book, incorporates the participants in games studies and also fans of games, whatever the sport. Fans grimace, scream and shout in frustration just as players do - they “fail” in fandom off the field just as players do on it. All are subjected to pain. Spectators and players become mixed up in this confusion. In Juul’s analysis of myriad video games, there are examples that focus on sport itself - Super Real Tennis and Track and Field, for instance. He also has a number of interesting things to say, in passing, about the way games and sport, especially professional sports industries, contribute to the development of the art form of “failure”. The pain and pleasure of gaming become two sides of the same coin in Juul’s own self-confessed obsessive fandom.

The question is whether the idea of the art of failure is substantial enough to hang a short book on. I am not sure that it is. Also, once that route for analysis has been started, the controversial parts of video gaming, and indeed video games as an industry, become more or less invisible: for example, contemporary video games’ deep connections to militarism and to developments in military technology find no resonance here. Nor does the issue of the reproduction of masculinities - and aggressive, violent, misogynist masculinity at that. Juul chooses the “lenses” of philosophy, psychology, game design and fiction, combined with his own experience as a game player, to explore the pain of playing video games and the art of failure. Despite the artful idea of “playing” with the art of failure, which comes through strongly here, the mélange that Juul offers us is no substitute for more established, and more structured, analysis of video games from the cultural studies or sociological perspective.

The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games

By Jesper Juul
MIT Press, 168pp, £13.95
ISBN 9780262019057
Published 5 April 2013

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Let me begin by thanking Steve Redhead for a thoughtful review of my book The Art of Failure. I would like to add a few comments, some concrete and some of a more principled nature. The Art of a Failure is a short and multidisciplinary book that examines the paradox of why the nominally enjoyable experience of playing video games (and non-digital games) appears to contain something that we do not actually enjoy – failure! I compare this to what has been known as the “paradox of tragedy”, and I chain this to psychology, learning, and game design, while trying to maintain a first-person sense of wonder. This is the focus of the book and as Redhead observes, this means that less time is given to issues outside that focus. The good news is that many people have done interesting work on gender and video games. I can recommend both of the “Barbie and Mortal Kombat” anthologies and everybody should be acquainted with the “#1reasonwhy“ discussion that has been taking place online and at game events during the last few months. Incidentally, my previous book, A Casual Revolution, examined recent changes in the video game audience and industry attitudes. In that book I discuss, and reject, the prejudice that the video game genres often associated with women are easy, or don’t let players fail. The connection between games and the military is more contested, but Patrick Crogan’s recent book “Gameplay Mode” examines this in detail, as does the work of Claus Pias especially in relation to cybernetics. The more principled issue is that Redhead appears to be making an absolute list of topics that every book should address regardless of its actual focus. I do not think that any particular discussion should be understood as an “eschewal” of or “substitute” for the multitude of other discussions that we can have. Can’t there be more than one discussion? My philosophy is rather that we for any particular question should always attempt to push ourselves a little outside our own comfort zones, and always look for new perspectives and methods for examining questions that we have not previously examined. Such the question explored in the book: what does it mean to be a sore loser? Jesper Juul New York University

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald