The Army and Democracy: Military Politics in Pakistan, by Aqil Shah

Farzana Shaikh finds persuasive arguments in an analysis of democracy and military rule in Pakistan

May 8, 2014

In the mid-1980s, while Pakistan laboured under yet another military dictatorship, the illustrious civil rights lawyer Aitzaz Ahsan deplored what he called his country’s “bonsai democracy”. Like a highly cultivated plant without deep roots or wide branches, it served as mere window-dressing to please Pakistan’s Western sponsors. While this description has rarely been matched, there is no dearth of analyses aiming to pinpoint the causes of Pakistan’s stunted democracy. Opinion, however, is sharply divided. For some the fault clearly lies with the elected politicians whose chronic divisions have fatally undermined the prospects of democratic consolidation. Others blame a politicised military for flouting the constitution and deliberately weakening civilian rule with the aim of enhancing its own power.

Joining the fray is US-based Pakistani scholar Aqil Shah, whose rich and skilfully argued book leaves no doubt about the military’s central responsibility in blighting the course of Pakistan’s democratisation. While some may see his approach as too forgiving of Pakistan’s politicians, his is a fresh and original perspective that demands serious consideration. Breaking with the conventional view of the military as a force prompted to intervene politically to secure its institutional interests, Shah argues (largely persuasively) that it is primarily deference to institutional norms that has conditioned the military’s responses to external and internal pressures.

It is these shared “traditions of tutelage” forged in the context of Pakistan’s geopolitical insecurity – namely the threat from India – and the country’s lack of national cohesion, he claims, that are largely to account for the military’s elevated and profoundly misplaced notions of “guardianship”. Together they have contributed not only to the military’s distrust of politicians as less able to guarantee national security but also, more damagingly for democracy, to the military’s “belief in the appropriateness of extra-constitutional change” to protect the “national interest” – a notion defined exclusively in line with its own interpretation. At the heart of this “military mentality” is the assumption that the military alone stands between anarchy and order: any weakening in its structure would “spell the end of Pakistan”.

Shah rightly gives such hyperbole short shrift. Instead, with his finely tuned analysis of the military’s declassified records, his searching exploration of the military’s socialisation programme and his deconstruction of the pronouncements of successive military regimes, he offers insights that point conclusively to the strength of his thesis.

Nevertheless, there remains the small matter of convincing some, at least, of his readers that what passes for the military’s normative framework is no more than an attempt to rationalise its hard-nosed interests. Recent ground-breaking work on Pakistan’s military suggests that, like those elsewhere in Asia, it has developed significant stakes in the economy that act as powerful incentives for the military’s repeated intervention in politics well beyond any perceived adherence to institutional norms. New work also testifies to the influence of more diverse centres of power in Pakistan, such as the judiciary and the media, which now harbour ambitions to “guard the guardians”. Although still vulnerable to the threat of military coercion, they are arguably better placed today than at any time in the past to challenge the military’s hubristic, self-serving tutelary beliefs.

The Army and Democracy: Military Politics in Pakistan

By Aqil Shah
Harvard University Press, 416pp, £25.95
ISBN 9780674728936 and 4419766 (e-book)
Published 24 April 2014

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate